logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
ChaoticSilence  
#1 Posted : Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:25:01 PM(UTC)
ChaoticSilence
Rank: Administration

Reputation:

Groups: Administration, Member
Joined: 12/29/2005(UTC)
Posts: 275
Man

We have decided to ask for our clients opinions about giving more control over the configuration of Application Pools for their sites.

If we receive a favourible response then we will allow our clients to have application pools dedicated to their sites and not shared with others. This will you to ask us for any configuration related to application pools serving your sites for example recycle times etc.

It will also improve your sites performance because you will not be sharing the w3wp.exe process with others who may be running badly coded scripts.

We have alreaady decided upon the pricing for this but will only go forword with this if some reasonable number of clients ask for this because it will require a bit of programming on our part to achieve it.

The pricing will be as follows(not final, open to discussion here):

Shared Clients: $5/month.

Resellers(1-30 domains): $10/month.

Resellers(31-100 domains): $20/month.

Resellers(100+ domains): $30/month.



Edited by user Thursday, January 19, 2006 7:27:44 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

LogicalGeekBoy  
#2 Posted : Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:20:46 PM(UTC)
LogicalGeekBoy
Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Member
Joined: 1/18/2006(UTC)
Posts: 25
Location: UK

Sounds like a good idea to me for improved performance and stablity. Would it be an extra option for those customers that wanted it? I guess some would be happy with the shared application pools. Obviously I'd want it for free, but I guess $5/month is a small price to pay for improved performance and stablity.
The world's most powerful Batch Image Processing application.
Alan LeftLion  
#3 Posted : Friday, February 3, 2006 6:14:35 AM(UTC)
Alan LeftLion
Rank: Advanced Member

Reputation:

Groups: Member
Joined: 1/31/2006(UTC)
Posts: 40
Location: Nottingham, UK

i'd be interested in this although would like some idea of real time benefits. as a reseller i'd actually prefer to have it for the domains i run/write rather than those i just provide hosting for. would that be possible / cheaper?
Smiling4ever  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, February 15, 2006 12:04:46 PM(UTC)
Smiling4ever
Rank: Administration

Reputation:

Groups: Administration, Member
Joined: 1/3/2006(UTC)
Posts: 348
Man

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
We need more participations here. :badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin:
Noman Dormosh

HostingFest
xuser  
#5 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:46:34 PM(UTC)
xuser
Rank: Advanced Member

Reputation:

Groups: Member
Joined: 1/15/2006(UTC)
Posts: 74
Location: Global

Looks like a good idea.
I might opt for the same if any of my clients require this.
peter  
#6 Posted : Saturday, February 18, 2006 8:09:09 AM(UTC)
peter
Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/18/2006(UTC)
Posts: 20
Location: Milwaukee, WI

A short downtime last night (during the second day of hosting of my first hostingfest site) was caused by someone else's ASPX script hanging the application pool.

I'm totally for this. It would be nice to both have a separate application pool per shared hosting account (or per domain) and also to be able to restart your application pool via the CP.

What kind of time frame for this to be implemented?
peter  
#7 Posted : Sunday, February 19, 2006 4:51:31 PM(UTC)
peter
Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/18/2006(UTC)
Posts: 20
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Hrm. Looks like a global change would be all that's needed to allow users (or support personnel on request) to create an isolated Application Pool. It's chapter 16 of the HELM Administrator's Guide.
peter  
#8 Posted : Sunday, February 19, 2006 5:01:20 PM(UTC)
peter
Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/18/2006(UTC)
Posts: 20
Location: Milwaukee, WI

I've had nothing but good experiences with one of the admins, Nasir. No jab intended. :)
ChaoticSilence  
#9 Posted : Monday, February 20, 2006 10:29:34 PM(UTC)
ChaoticSilence
Rank: Administration

Reputation:

Groups: Administration, Member
Joined: 12/29/2005(UTC)
Posts: 275
Man

About Application Pools.

That global change would put each and every site in its own application pool, which would mean very high prices because after 100 domains the server will start to crawl :)

What i am taking about is allocating a pool to a customer on request whereupon every website of his or his users will go on that pool.

We need more people to vote for this because it will require us to do some custom programing :)
lweinberg  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:28:45 PM(UTC)
lweinberg
Rank: Newbie

Reputation:

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/21/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1
Location: Florida

This is a great idea and was something I was going to ask about...but I would like it to be cheaper.:)
Alan LeftLion  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:47:28 PM(UTC)
Alan LeftLion
Rank: Advanced Member

Reputation:

Groups: Member
Joined: 1/31/2006(UTC)
Posts: 40
Location: Nottingham, UK

i'm up for this for 2 of my domains but not too fussed about having it for the rest under my reseller account.
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.