|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/24/2006
Posts: 82
Points: 6
Location: Lisle, IL
|
I am still hesitant about this. I don't want to have to explain again to my clients why something is changing with the webmail. Not to mention any downtime associated with it.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 11/30/2006
Posts: 22
Points: 0
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
A beta hurts no-one though. Personally, I'm confident you'll find it worth the effort. All my clients have been very happy with MDaemon and I've been getting a lot of flack for moving them off it. Before my move to HostingFest I was pretty close to co-locating a server near me jsut to keep hosting my own email. Nothing comes close to MDaemon. Just give it a fair try.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 11/30/2006
Posts: 22
Points: 0
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
I will say this though.. MDameon definitely needs to be tested well with HELM. I understnad that some control panels, hopefully HELM, do support MDaemon. If so, that would be great. I do know that standalone MDaemon without a control panel is not ISP-environment friendly, it simply doesn't have the management tools built into it yet. But I think the control panels fill that gap.
Testing will let us know. That's the only deficiency I'm aware of and hopefully HELM fills the gap.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/5/2006
Posts: 96
Points: 24
|
MyNet-Tony wrote:I am still hesitant about this. I don't want to have to explain again to my clients why something is changing with the webmail. Not to mention any downtime associated with it. I agree, plus recent sql server flareup is making a number of clients on edge. Let some time pass with stable service than make changes if needed. If however it urgent to do a switch, implement it only one of the e-mail servers and point the people who want to it leaving the bulk unaffected.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/24/2006
Posts: 82
Points: 6
Location: Lisle, IL
|
I agree - we need some trouble free-time before we go messing with stuff, even if the beta goes smoothly.
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member  Groups: Member
Joined: 3/20/2006 Posts: 30 Points: 0 Location: n/a
|
MyNet-Tony wrote:I agree - we need some trouble free-time before we go messing with stuff, even if the beta goes smoothly. Totally agreed.......
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/16/2006
Posts: 78
Points: 0
Location: Global
|
I think we should wait for SM 4. They are going to integrate SpamAssis to their mail server which will be a big enhancement.
Moreover, due to many recent issues with mails and server downtime, I would like to delay anything for sometime at any cost.
We need stable servers and support.
Just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration
Groups: Administration, Member
Joined: 12/30/2005
Posts: 284
Points: 9
|
We have canceled this due to customer requests.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 11/30/2006
Posts: 22
Points: 0
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
I can understand this move. So, since SmartMail is it for some time, I'd like to see the SPAM filtering working well.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 11/30/2006
Posts: 22
Points: 0
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
Any time frame on an upgrade to SM4?
Thanks.
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
YAFPro Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)Powered by YAF 1.9.403 beta |
YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NETThis page was generated in 0.074 seconds.
